Norway


Today we have the pleasure to publish an invited guest post made by a UPC student. Daniel Torán Mercadé was a student of the Department of Electronic Engineering at ETSEIB-UPC and he has been working on a master thesis named Comparison of different Internet of Things . Dani tested different platforms such as AWS, IBM Watson , Microsoft Azure and thethings.iO using the provided by a temperature sensor of a device and today he is going to explain the of all of these IoT platforms with Sigfox.

- student upc thethingsio 1030x687 - Benchmark IoT platforms for Sigfox products

On his master thesis the student configured a Sigfox device with several IoT platforms. The Sigfox device is sending periodically temperature readings to the Sigfox Cloud and these are sent from there to the different IoT platforms, which have been configured to receive and store the data. Once the data is stored in the IoT platforms, the main objective is to get useful insight from them. Therefore, graphical visualizations have been carried out. The report explains in detail how to configure these platforms in order to receive and analyze data, conveyed by a Sigfox device.

The added value provided by this project is that the reader can get a broader vision of how to configure and deploy an IoT architecture and, more importantly, which IoT platform
better fits with the requirements of each and every project. To make things easier, a comparison of the platforms, considering features such as easiness to connect and data analysis, pricing, flexibility or services, has been checked.

Comparing features of the IoT platforms

This is the result table of comparing the different IoT platforms AWS IoT, Microsoft Azure IoT, thethings.iO and IBM Watson.

- table comparing iot platforms 1030x714 - Benchmark IoT platforms for Sigfox products

In relation to the thethings.iO IoT platform, it has been configured in order to receive the data from the Sigfox Cloud with the provided Callback URL. Then, by means of a Sigfox parser, the data has been addressed and given an attribute. Finally, a table and a graphic visualization have been created in order to watch the trend of the temperature during a period of .

The steps followed to connect the Sigfox devices are much simpler with thethings.iO than the steps done in the other IoT platforms. The physical thing, which corresponds to the Sigfox device, which is conveying data, is registered / provisioned in the IoT platform cloud automatically and the data automatically stored after generating a Sigfox payload parser.

With reference to the strengths of thethings.iO IoT platform, it can be stated that it is simple to configure the connection between the Sigfox Cloud and the thethings.iO platform. Moreover, it has a different internal structure than the other platforms which makes relatively easy to make an analysis right after the data reaches the platforms in comparison with the other IoT platforms. A feature that singles out thethings.iO IoT platform is that it is software and hardware agnostic, therefore, it can be to any device whereas the other platforms had a few group of hardware to which they can be .

This post and project has been developed by Daniel Torán Mercadé graduated in Industrial Engineering at ETSEIB-UPC and it has been mentored by Manuel Moreno Eguílaz UPC Senior Researcher. Further information of how to configure the platforms can be found here on Daniel Torán master thesis.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here