A has dismissed years-old allegations that abused a dominant position to prevent rival exchange operator Burgundy from renting space in a data .

Bank-owned Burgundy inked a contract with data centre operator Verizon in 0 but the American quickly cancelled the deal, citing a “one exchange” policy. The one exchange was Nasdaq, which controlled the part of the data centre where trading took place, locating its trading engine there.

Burgundy reported Verizon to Sweden’s competition authority, which ended up taking the case against Nasdaq to the courts.

Seven years on, the Swedish Patent and Market Court has ruled that Nasdaq did not have any legal obligations to give Burgundy access to the part of the data centre it controlled, nor Nasdaq’s customers located there, nor to the financial infrastructure that Nasdaq had invested in and controlled.

“The Court states that Nasdaq has acted in accordance with its contractual rights and not used a dominant position to advantages that Nasdaq would otherwise not be able to ,” says a statement.

The consortium of Swedish banks and brokerages that set up Burgundy in 2008, specifically to challenge Nasdaq’s dominance, ended up selling up to Oslo Børs in 20.;

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here